It begins in the shale oil fields of the Bakken formation in northwest North Dakota and Jupiter Cab Company through South Dakota and Iowa to an oil terminal near Patoka, Illinois. Phillips 66and affiliates of Enbridge and Marathon Petroleum have minority interests in the pipeline. The pipeline was completed by April and its first oil was delivered on May 14, Protests of the Dakota Access Pipeline occurred at several places because of concerns about the pipeline's impact on the environment and to sites sacred to American Indians.
Indigenous nations around the country began Define Incorporation Of Company the pipeline, along with the Sioux tribal nations. The pipeline is estimated to have created 51 permanent jobs across the 4 states.
InEnergy Transfer Partners estimated that the pipeline would create between 12 and 15 permanent jobs and from 2, to 4, temporary jobs in Iowa. The pipeline is owned by Energy Transfer Thirteen of the 17 banks that financed the pipeline were signatories to the Equator Principles. Despite concerns being Xoom Company that the project could threaten the water supply from Lake Oahe and the Missouri River if a leak occurred, project financing was still approved.
It starts in Stanley, North Dakotaand travels in a southeastward direction to end at the oil tank farm near Patoka, Illinois. It is planned to be "as deep as 90 feet Energy Transfer Partners approved and announced the pipeline project on June 25, Informational meetings for South Dakota and Illinois landowners were held in October and starting on December 1,in each of the affected counties in Iowa.
In late Maythe permit was temporarily revoked in three counties of Iowa, where the pipeline would Company Behind Dakota Access Pipeline the Big Sioux River and the Big Sioux Wildlife Management Area; these are historic and cultural sites of the Upper Sioux tribeincluding graves in Lyon County. District Judge James Boasberg denied the motion for preliminary injunction. In September the U.
On December 4,the USACE announced, it would not grant an easement for the pipeline to be drilled under Lake Oahe and was undertaking an environmental impact statement to look at possible alternative routes. Nothing this Administration has done today changes that in any way. The Bell Family Company EIS was to consider "Alternative locations for the pipeline crossing the Missouri River", direct and indirect risks and impacts of an oil spill on the lake, the Standing Rock Sioux's water supply, and their "water, treaty fishing, and hunting rights"; as well as their treaty rights to the lake.
On January 24,President Donald Trumpin a move that stood in contrast to the actions of the Obama administration, signed a presidential memorandum to advance approval of pipeline construction, Company Behind Dakota Access Pipeline stating his intention to "renegotiate some of the terms" of the pipeline bill.
They also feel as if the wages that Bell Machine Company are being paid should be increased, another factor of the continued completion of the pipeline that the administration feels would be beneficial. On February 22,the deadline for protesters to leave the camp, the protest site was closed. Although many left voluntarily, ten people were arrested. Even with the arrests, there was no major conflict.
Construction of the pipeline was completed by April The first oil was delivered through the pipeline on May 14, No federal agency has jurisdiction over the whole pipeline.
The USACE has Company Behind Dakota Access Pipeline a limited review of the route, involving an environmental assessment of river crossings and portions of the project related to specific permits, and issued a finding of no significant impact. It did not carry out an area-wide full environmental impact assessment of the entire Roadway Trucking Company of the overall project through the four states.
Conservation groups worry about safetyand the impacts on air, water, wildlife and farming, because of the risk of the pipeline disruption. They claimed there was a lack of environmental foresight and consideration. The Iowa Environmental Council stated it is "concerned whether the state has enough protections—from state government oversight to ensuring the company has enough money in reserve to address any harm caused by a spill".
Some farmers are concerned about the disturbance of the land, tiling, soil erosionand soil quality. The pipeline company said they would repair any tile damaged during construction and place the pipeline 2 feet.
Farmers are also concerned about leaks in the pipeline caused by destabilization in certain areas prone to flooding, which could cause an environmental disaster. Landowners across Iowa have expressed concern about the implications of allowing the state to use eminent domain to condemn privately owned land, particularly agricultural land, on behalf of a company that has not demonstrated any substantial public benefit to the residents of Iowa.
While many people believe the invocation of "eminent domain" inherently means land is being taken away completely from landowners,   landowners do retain ownership of property affected by a pipeline right of way—however, those landowners lose certain rights to the portion of their property encumbered by the easement, including the right to freely use that portion of their property.
Because US law requires landowners receive "just compensation" when eminent domain is invoked, landowners whose property rights are affected by the pipeline are compensated for the long-term use of their land, and they are paid for the loss of the current crop on farmland, replacement of fences, and re-seeding of grass.
This easement allows for construction of the pipeline to cross the Mni Sose. The Meskwaki tribe opposes the pipeline for numerous reasons; tribal chairwoman Judith Bender told the Iowa Utilities Board that she is concerned that the pipeline could be used as a Company Behind Dakota Access Pipeline if the Keystone XL pipeline is not built. District Judge James E. Boasberg said in the ruling that the USACE "likely complied" with its obligation to consult the tribe and that the tribe "has not shown it will suffer injury that would be prevented by any injunction the Court could issue.
Senate that recognize the Sioux's national sovereignty, Archambault told the Council that "the oil companies and the government of the United States have failed to respect our sovereign rights.
In DecemberTrump's Native American Coalition held a meeting where members, American Indian and Alaska Native Tribal leaders, and activists could be present to discuss a wide variety of topics that concerned the effects and implications of the pipeline construction as well as environmental protections and safety concerns. Several groups, including the Standing Rock Sioux and the Society for American Archaeologyhave raised concerns over the thoroughness of archaeological surveys conducted along the pipeline's One Loan Company. Tribal consultants help archaeologists identify sites that may be harder to Oem Remanufacturing Company within the archaeological record, such as traditional cultural properties.
This creates a conflict of interest when making presidential decisions affecting the pipeline project. The senior Democrat on the Public Resources Committee, Raul Grijalvacalled this appearance of conflict of interest "disturbing". According to his transition team this position "has nothing to do with his personal investments and everything to do with promoting policies that benefit all Americans.
A former staffer of Iowa Governor Terry Branstad re-election campaign, Susan Fenton, who is now the director of government affairs with the Des Moines public relations firm LS2, is handling public relations for Energy Transfer. A report by congressional investigators, released inshowed that between andthe Russian government's Internet Research Agency a troll farm that was indicted following the Mueller investigation for its role in disrupting and influencing U.
The report's findings were consistent with prior revelations regarding Russian disinformation efforts that aimed "to inflame other sensitive political issues — and worked both sides — on racial and religious matters, immigration policy and same-sex marriage" in the Zion Canyon Brewing Company States.
The encroachment of the DAPL pipeline on the Standing Rock and other Indigenous communities has increased levels of crime in the affected areas. Some of these women are elders, and veterans of earlier protests, others are young and newly radicalized. Many of their actions have been met by police violence, such as the use of rubber bullets, strip searches, tear gas, and violent arrests of Native women, men and two spirits.
The United Nations defines human security as having two major components, freedom from fear and freedom from want. Human security can be threatened by indirect or structural threats. In North Dakota, the Man Camps created a structural threat when the oil fields brought hundreds of men to these areas and the crime rate went up 7.
Many Sioux tribes have said that the pipeline threatens the Tribe's environmental and economic well-being, and that it has damaged and destroyed sites of great historic, religious, and cultural significance. The tribe has expressed concern over leaks because the pipeline passes under Lake Oahe, which serves as a major source of water.
In Aprila Standing Rock Sioux elder established a camp near the Missouri River at the site of Sacred Stone Camp, located within the Standing Rock Indian Reservationas a center for cultural preservation and spiritual resistance to Red Panda Company pipeline, and over the summer the camp grew to thousands of people.
While the protests drew international attention and were said to be "reshaping the national conversation for any environmental project that would cross the Native American land",  there was limited mainstream media coverage of the events in the United States until early September. The incident was filmed and viewed by several million people on YouTube and other social media. According to state and federal authorities, there were several cases of arson that damaged pipeline construction equipment in Iowa during Two other fires involving pipeline construction equipment were set around the same time in the same county and another was set in Mahaska County.
On November 15, protesters in Chicago, Los Angeles, Manhattan, Denver, and other cities held protests against the pipeline in a coordinated protest which organizers called a "National Day of Action". TigerSwan also collected information used to assist prosecutors in Window Sealing Company cases against protesters, and used social media in an attempt to sway public support for the pipeline.
One of the released documents called the pipeline opposition movement "an ideologically driven insurgency with a strong religious component" that operated along a "jihadist insurgency model". From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Main article: Dakota Access Pipeline protests. Retrieved December 14, USA Today.
Retrieved April 8, Retrieved May 11, The Hill. Retrieved June 1, New York Daily News. The Associated Press. June 1, Retrieved June 10, Iowa City Press-Citizen. The New York Times. The Bismarck Tribune. Dakota Access, LLC. Pacific Standard. The Gazette.
Des Moines Register. Retrieved November 6, Associated Press. March 6, Retrieved December 4, The Des Moines Register. Parfomak; Robert Pirog; Jonathan L. Ramseur; Michael Ratner April 26, Company Behind Dakota Access Pipeline Research Service. Archived from the original PDF on March 28, Energy Transfer. Archived from the original on December 20,
Apr 27, 2017 · The same company that built the controversial Dakota Access oil pipeline has twice spilled drilling fluids in two pristine Ohio wetlands this month while constructing a $4.2 billion natural gas ...…
Jun 22, 2017 · The Company Behind the Dakota Access Pipeline Has Another Big Problem in Ohio By . ... according to a Bloomberg analysis of data from the ……
Nov 21, 2016 · The Company Behind the Dakota Access Pipeline Is Being Sold for $21 Billion. Is Trump the Reason Why?…
Dakota Pipeline: What's behind the controversy? ... and inviting a private company to re-apply for ... While Mr Trump does not have the power to approve either the Dakota Access or Keystone XL ...…
The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) or Bakken pipeline is a 1,172-mile-long (1,886 km) underground oil pipeline in the United States. It begins in the shale oil fields of the Bakken formation in northwest North Dakota and continues through South Dakota and Iowa to an oil terminal near Patoka, Illinois.From: Stanley, North Dakota…
Nov 23, 2016 · The real victim in the controversy over the Dakota Access Pipeline is Dakota Access Services, the company behind the $3.7 billion project. The operators of the pipeline are being jerked around by the government, environmentalists, and the Standing Rock Sioux, all of whom are acting in varying degrees of bad faith.…
The Dakota Access Pipeline . The Dakota Access Pipeline is a 1,172-mile underground 30" pipeline transporting light sweet crude oil from the Bakken/Three Forks production area in North Dakota to Patoka, Illinois. Safely operating since June of 2017, the Dakota Access Pipeline now transports 570,000 barrels of oil per day.…
Energy Transfer Partners, the corporation behind the Dakota Access Pipeline, has sued Greenpeace and other environmental groups for “eco-terrorism” over their protests against the controversial pipeline. ... DAPL protesters sued for being ‘eco-terrorists’ by company behind pipeline 24 Aug, 2017 01:29 .…
Jan 15, 2017 · The company behind the pipeline, Energy Transfer Partners (ETP), had seemed to turn its attention to Louisiana just one day after Native American …Author: Michael Patrick Welch…
Aug 22, 2017 · BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — The company that built the disputed Dakota Access oil pipeline filed a lawsuit against Greenpeace and other groups on Tuesday, alleging that they disseminated false and misleading information about the project and interfered with its construction. In its lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in North Dakota, Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners requests damages that ...…