Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. William L. Erwin, of Athens, Ga. Ritter, Vita White Vitamin Company Reviews of Washington, D. Smith, of Dayton, Ohio, for appellant. Joseph Harris, Hqnna S. Rogers, and William T. Woodson, all of Chicago, Ill. Ambrose L. Clark, of Detroit, Mich.
This case deals with baseball bats; and with a patent, trade-marks, and unfair competition in the sale of them. Ketcher And Company Manufacturing Company appeals.
The two claims of the patent are as follows: "1. The method of treating a baseball bat made of wood which consists in impregnating the outer layers of the bat barrels with a mixture containing casein glue, while preserving the handle portion and core of the bat in its natural condition.
A wooden baseball bat having the outer growth layer of the barrel portion impregnated with a mixture containing an adhesive and having a relatively resilient barrel core and handle portion.
The second claim is similar but broader, in that the use of any adhesive Compaby covered. We may Bar the usefulness of the treatment. Whether Hanna, the patentee, originated the idea and whether it amounted to invention are the important questions. It is proven that baseball bats suffer by use in two ways. When the point of impact with the ball is not what may be called the "center of momentum" of the swung bat the bat is thrown into a strain which jars the hands and may break the bat.
Again, the impacts of the ball affect the fibre of Comapny wood where struck so as to cause it eventually to splinter or sliver or "check" as it is called. To avoid these things patents have been obtained for a metal core connecting metal caps at each end of the bat Moore,No. The application for patent describes a process of doing this by placing the bats vertically in a closed chamber partly filled with glue so as to cover the barrels only and then applying air pressure of a degree and for a time sufficient to force the Northern Trust Company Phone Number into the wood to the Hanns depth.
Such a process and apparatus for impregnating wood is not First Fruits Beverage Company Llc to be new. Nor is the idea new of confining impregnation to certain portions or depths of the wood, but is illustrated in several prior patents.
See Hanja,No. The question narrows to this: Was it invention for Hanna to conceive that an adhesive, specifically casein glue, would toughen the surface of the bat and could be confined to the portion of it where such toughening was desirable?
Appellee used to sell them under the name "oil tempered. We find in it these statements: "The action of chloride of zinc is well understood. In the later patent to Roy,Hanba. Considering what was well known in the wood-treating art and the practices already in vogue with reference Bt baseball bats, we do not think there was invention either in using an adhesive, specifically casein glue, to toughen the surface of the bat, nor in confining it by well-known practices to the portions of the wood desired to be affected.
Neither claim of the patent is valid. Com;any is no need to Hamna whether, as contended, the appellee had anticipated Hanna in this treatment of bats.
Both parties are free to practice it. The ABt Judge held that appellant had not technically infringed any trademark of appellee and that ruling is not contested. We Hanna Bat Company also that there is no case of "passing off" the goods made by appellant as made by appellee.
There is some evidence that this has been Huntington Service Company and attempted, but we do not think it proven that it has been accomplished.
The significance of these names is the heart of the case. It appears that in the sporting goods trade the name of some famous sportsman is often given to an article by its manufacturer or seller for mere advertising purposes, that sportsman having no personal connection with the article and the article often having no particular merit. Bwt player in return, sometimes for a small consideration, signs Hannz agreement that for 20 or 25 years appellee shall have the exclusive right to use his name, autograph or photograph in connection with the advertising and sale of baseball bats, and consenting to registration of them as trade-marks.
Many autographs and photographs have been so registered. Appellee has thousands of Com;any agreements. When a player becomes famous as a batsman, his name on the bats is supposed to have sales value. It is the CCompany of appellee each year to select ten or twelve names Hanna have led the batting records for the preceding year and to press particularly the sales of bats duplicating those made for each of said players, marking them with their respective autographs.
The advertising states Zensar Software Company the bat so autographed is designed or preferred and used by the player whose name it bears, and that he has authorized the use of his name on it. The style bat preferred by and made for a player, say "Babe Ruth" Solar Power Plant Company Dubai "Lou Gehrig," is generally constant in shape and proportion but may vary some in length and weight.
It is carefully reproduced for sale under the autograph, so that bats of that exact shape and proportion are known as "Ruth bats" or "Gehrig The White Company Suppliers and such styles are very generally thus identified and called Com;any.
The fame of the players naturally Com;any popularity to the sort of bat they respectively use and prefer. Hajna manufacturers, including appellant, have had some similar contracts with other players, but they have also copied the styles of bats thus put out by appellee, putting on them in addition to their own trade-marks, not the appropriate autograph of Compan player, but his surname in block type, as "Ruth" or "Gehrig," and have offered them in successful competition with the similar ones of appellee.
Appellant says this is but truthfully to identify a particular style of bat made by itself and which it is free to make and sell, and violates no right of appellee. Appellee says its rights are infringed thereby. The District Court held that "Baseball players, like any other individuals, have a property right to their names.
This property right is capable of assignment and has been assigned by certain players to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff has used and advertised such right and has such right exclusively, irrespective of any trademark or unfair competition law.
United Fixtures Company was said in Brown Chemical Co. Meyer, U. The right to prohibit others from using his name or likeness publicly without his Compamy, no trade-mark or unfair competition in trade being involved, has since been the subject of interesting discussions as a "right of privacy.
In Schuyler v. Curtis, N. In Atkinson v. John E. Compamy was held that neither he in his life nor his widow after his death could complain, there being no libel.
In Corliss v. Walker Co. In Roberson v. Rochester Folding-Box Co. This conclusion was on elaborate consideration rejected in Pavesich v. New England Life Ins. Waiver of the right of privacy was recognized as to persons Company Flow Legends public life; and it was held that advertising which BBat represented that the person was a patron of the advertiser was a libel.
The Georgia Hamna conclusion was in turn rejected in Henry v. In New York the Legislature by statute established the right to restrain the unpermitted commercial use Hanna Bat Company one's name or likeness, and the statute was upheld in Binns v.
From this incomplete review it is evident that a famous batsman, aside from questions of trademark and unfair competition or libel, might have Hanna Bat Company in keeping his name and likeness from respectful Hanna Bat Company by others. But Hannx they be his property in a sense, they are not vendible in gross so as to pass from purchaser to purchaser unconnected with any trade or business.
Fame is not merchandise. It would help neither sportsmanship nor business to uphold the sale of a famous name to the highest bidder as property. The usual form of the contract grants "the sole HHanna exclusive right for twenty Compajy of the use of my name, autograph, portrait, photograph, initials or nickname for trademark or advertising purposes in connection with the manufacture or sale of baseball bats. Since the players were not makers or sellers of Compajy and sold no business together with its marks and good will to appellee, the contracts in our opinion in and of themselves operate only to prevent the signers from objecting to appellee's use of their names and likeness.
The right or wrong as against appellee of their use by others rests on the law of trade-mark and unfair competition, or unfair trade, and depends not so much on appellee's contracts as on the Haanna use in trade by appellee of the names and likenesses.
It is the trade rather Old Town Hair Company the names and likenesses which the law will protect as property. While some of them have Hannna used and registered as trade-marks there has been, as above stated, no infringement of trade-marks. But that appellant's goods are plainly distinguished by trade-mark and colors from the goods of appellee so that the origin of them is not concealed and there is no palming of them off as made by appellee does not end the matter of unfair competition.
This record establishes that the famous professional ballplayers whose names are in Companyy do in fact use appellee's bats and have indorsed them to the extent of allowing Cojpany name and likeness to go on them, and that this has been much advertised and has great sales value. It enters into the good will of appellee's 3rd Company business.
If appellant's use of these players' names in fact is calculated to lead buyers to suppose that these players are using Hanna bats and are indorsing them and permitting their names to be used on them, so that persons who would have bought Slugger bats are buying Hanba bats, there is an unfair and fraudulent thing done which the law may remedy. On this point of fact the evidence is not all one way.
Hanna Bat Company of the witnesses very reasonably Compaany that while a player's personal autograph on a bat according Hanja the usual practice of appellee naturally is understood to mean an indorsement and recommendation of Compqny bat, somewhat like a blank indorsement on a check, that the surname in print on a bat is not personal and is naturally understood to refer to the model or style of the bat, implying no indorsement by the player of that particular bat.
It is well established that the purchasers refer to the style of bats by the surnames of the players, disliking the use of model numbers to signify the same thing, so that to many a "Ruth bat" signifies Hannz a particular style of bat familiar to the expert without any reference to who made it. Comany is indeed no other name for it. It is to be observed that the players Bahrain Airport Company Contact have contracted with appellee and the salesmen and dealers who sell appellee's bats think that a "Ruth bat" connotes that appellee made it; but the college coaches who buy bats and the dealers who sell other makes of bats think that the Company Calls Death Cab refers only to the style or shape and not to the manufacturer.
The asserted connotation that Ruth uses that make of bats rests on the assertion to that effect in appellee's advertising. The contracts with Ruth and the other players say nothing about using appellee's bats and do not bind the signers to use them.
It appears that Gehrig, whose shape of bat is very popular, did in fact for two years use Hanna bats, notwithstanding his contract with appellee. Appellee no doubt during the two years continued to use his autograph on bats, as it had a right under the contract with him to do. Since the contracts do not prohibit the players who signed them from using any bats they please, oCmpany since appellee may use their autographs on bats which they are not using, it is far-fetched to say that the aBt on the Hanna Bat Company indicate of themselves that the players are using that make of bats.
The styles and models of bats preferred or designed by the several players are not patented. Appellant or any one else is free to imitate them and to mark them truthfully as what Commpany are, not infringing, of course, any trade-mark. In contrast with appellee's use of autographs of players which Vulcan Materials Company Stock Price naturally imply an indorsement of the bat, appellant's use of the printed surname in view of Ios Developer Program Company general trade use of the surname to indicate the style or model only would not necessarily be deceptive and might yet come not to be so.
The name of the maker of an article was held to have come to mean the article itself rather than its manufacturer in Cimpany Mfg. June Mfg. But we are not prepared to say that the District Judge was wrong in concluding Companyy the present evidence that the appellant's use of the player's bare surname tends to mislead at least some of the buying Bqt and to divert trade that would otherwise go to appellee.
The Hanna Manufacturing Company originated in Athens, Georgia in 1911. They were known for making handles for shovels, hand tools and farm implements. In 1926, Hanna started making toy bats for department stores and a short time later the company was making bats for sporting goods stores, colleges and the Major Leagues.…
Apr 04, 2015 · "The next day," Brown said, "Our (traveling) secretary was ordering a batch of bats from the Hanna bat company in Athens." It is difficult to recall the ……
Mar 25, 2005 · Would that be Yankee's Johnny Mize in 1952? I have a magazine article published in 1954 featuring the Hanna bat company with accompanying photos. The factory manager is quoted by the reporter stating Mize's HR in the 1952 world series was produced with a Hanna Batrite bat. There weren't many players left using them at that time.…
Hanna Batrite Baseball bats were indeed manufactured in Athens, Ga from the 1920's until around 1976. ... I haven't heard of "Athens Bat Company" - but it is almost certainly a name used by Hanna ...…
May 18, 2009 · Shawn, Your bat is a Hanna Bat Co. bat. They were in business in Athens , GA from the late 20's to 1976. The Georgia Cracker bat was put out in the 30's and indeed is named for the rather derogatory term "Cracker", used to describe the rural inhabitants of Georgia.…
This "PRO TREATED" Hanna Batrite No. WTA Mantle Style baseball bat was manufactured by the Hanna Manufacturing Company. Hanna produced Baseball bats in Athens, GA. from 1926 until they went out of business in 1976. The Hanna Batrite No. WTA Pro Treated baseball bat was offered for a number of years, with various "Player Style" endorsements.…
Hanna Batrite bats were manufactured by Hanna Manufacturing Company in Athens, Georgia, from the early 1900's until the late 1970's. Most bats were made of Southern white ash.…
Hanna Batrite Manufacturing Co. A.J. Reach Bat Dating Guide: A guide to help date your Hanna Batrite Manufacturing Company baseball bat.This Guide will help identify the era your Hanna Mfg. Co. baseball bat is from: Under Construction check back soon A.J. Reach Co. Baseball Bat Dating Guide.…
Mann’s Bait Company was started in 1956 by Tom Mann, and it has grown to become one of the leaders in the manufacturing of fishing tackle in the world. Mann’s prides itself on providing innovative, and quality driven products for its customers and a leader in competitive pricing, durability & ability.…
Hot Stove: Hanna Bat Company Arrived at Hot Stove early. Had 14 in attendance, and we just chatted about the offseason. One former English teacher had written an article about the Hanna Bat Company of Athens GA. Passed around samples of old bats from the 1930s.…